sci-fi music vids

posted on May 5, 2011 in review,video

hey friends,

lots going on as Cannes is a week away! working on a new poster and website for CERTIFIED, expect to see those soon.

until then, here are two different sci-fi themed music videos.

Hooray For Earth’s “True Loves” video is a great low-budget science fiction film. It’s almost ALL natural locations and features a very small cast. the effects are limited and judiciously used. the cinematography and editing are top notch. all these combined creates a ethereal and compelling story.

on my first viewing I was surprised when it ended. I was so engaged in the world and vibe that I wanted MORE. and it’s pretty rare that a music video inspires that sort of reaction.

and for something completely different in scope, here’s Katy Perry’s “E.T.” it’s big, bold, and over the top. the production value and effects are top notch. the editing is tight and the photography is gorgeous. did it leave me wanting to see more? not really… but I enjoyed the 5 minute ride.

-Luke

Skyline: What the heck were they thinking???

posted on November 18, 2010 in rant,review

Howdy friends!

Sorry I missed last week. My laptop was in the shop…and my blog password was on it.

A lot has happened this last week, first off I’ve locked the edit on my short film “Certified!” I’ve also made good progress on a new feature screenplay and learned some cool new things in After Effects. But that’s not what I’m going to be writing about. Today I want to write about the film “Skyline.”

Last week Clovis and I went to the Arclight Pasadena to catch the film. Now we are both fans of sci-fi. The good, the bad, the cheesy…we can enjoy it all. But even we have a line. “Skyline” rode over that line like a bear in a tutu rides a unicycle. And the films makes about as much sense as that analogy.

***Spoiler Alert****You’ve been warned***

I almost don’t even know where to begin…well, I guess the beginning is as good a spot as any.

Most of the film takes place in a posh “LA” apartment. It’s the “Penthouse” although…there are multiple apartments on that floor? (I’m confused already) It’s owned by a sweet buff black dude who’s an artist? rapper? director? VFX company owner? The film doesn’t bother to make it clear…but it is clear that he’s cheating on his live in girlfriend with his almost live-in assistant.

In this apartment they have AUTOMATED CURTAINS.


The Curtains

A large, like really large, part of the film’s “plot” involves the curtains. Are they up? Are they down? What happens when they fall? The characters spend a TREMENDOUS amount of time adjusting them. And then talking about how bad it would be if the curtains FELL.

um…you guys know there’s at least TWO other rooms, right? Am I the only one that thinks maybe you should go in one of those?

Of course, when the curtains are functioning…the characters still need to know what’s going on outside. So they use a telescope.

The Telescope
Luckily for the other people in the room…and us…the telescope is hooked into the flatscreen TV!!! That way, we can see what the person looking into the scope sees, then we can all discuss it! Also lucky is that fact that the telescope operators are VERY good at following action – including SPEEDING JETS and MISSILES.

Oh, it’s also very lucky that even during a MASSIVE alien invasion the power grid is still functioning! Our national defenses might go down…but good ol’ LADWP – they keep cranking out the juice! This is important, cause if there was no power how would we see the Aliens through the telescope via the HDTV????

I know, maybe we could go to the roof…with a handgun and get a better look. Along the way, let’s get scared by a neighbor for NO REASON.

The Roof
The characters go up here to “see what’s happening.” Because apparently, at that time opening the drapes was not an option. While up there, they almost get attacked by an alien.

Then later, on at least one occasion they go BACK on the roof because…it’s safer? they want to escape? I have no idea. Their goal is to get off the building and to safety, which at one point they say is the Marina. So how would going to the roof help accomplish this? It seems going on the roof would limit your options of, well, um…going anywhere??? Am I right?

Of course, it does give you the option of having a JET bounce on the roof and fly over you. Because a 60 TON jet would really “bounce” as it crashed onto the top of a building. And if it DID bounce there would be no wind, fire, or debris that would hit the characters. None…

But somehow the characters manage to defeat an alien or two on the roof. And in the process, they realizes that “OMG, the aliens have HUMAN brains in them.”

The Brains
So basically, the movie is now like “The Matrix…but with brains.” Okay…that’s cool. I guess. The aliens need to harvest human brains. That’s creepy! So they come to Earth and start collecting EVERYONE so that they can harvest their brains.

Once inside the alien ship we get the big reveal…the Aliens actually run on HUMAN brains. The brains of humans become the brains of the aliens!!! They are using us against ourselves! Oh the humanity!!!! (get it? get it?)

So they take our brains use them and then poop the spent brains out before getting a new HUMAN brain…they uh…

“Wait, you said these are ALIENS right?”

Yeah, that’s right.

“Like, they came from OUTER SPACE?”

Yeah, they totally flew their big ass starships to Earth and starting invading…cause they need our brains!!!

“Um…so what did they run on before they got here?”

**cricket cricket**

Wait, what? The aliens need something that DOESN’T exist off of earth to run their entire species?

How the?…
but what did they?…
I mean, wouldn’t this have been a?…
owww…my brain hurts.
(see what I did there??)

Not only is the derivative, unimaginative, and hackneyed…it also DOESN’T MAKE SENSE.

But at least the aliens looked kind of cool…

-Luke

a journey to nerd mecca

posted on July 30, 2010 in behind-the-scenes,review,travel

this last weekend was the 42nd annual Comic Con.  if for some strange reason you escaped the media blitz surrounding this event, let me give you a quick explanation of it.

imagine nerds.  now imagine their mecca.  now imagine that large media corporations figured out that if they make things the nerds like, the nerds will spend their money on said items.  now image the large media corporations decided to sponsor extravagant parties in nerd-mecca.

walking dead

perhaps a tad over simplified, but the small convention for comic book artist, fans, and publishers has grown into an epic “Festival of the Popular Arts,” that features comics, movies, tv shows, games, toys, original art, t-shirts, and cos-play.

dr. horrible

this was my 4th year going.  each year I feel like I understand the convention a little more and am able to negotiate the pitfalls a little better.  this time I wasn’t in it for the costumes, games, toys, and comics… My goal was to attend the panels and listen to filmmakers and artists talk about making their work.  Hopefully, I can apply their lessons to my own projects.

next I’m going to write about the different panels and the specific things I found interesting in each…there’s no real “through line” or consistent theme other than these are filmmakers making the sorts of films that I like to watch…and would love to be making.

TRON: Legacy

the first panel I went to was for TRON, in Hall H.  last year, the first day in Hall H was a mad house.  ”Twilight” AND “Avatar” were scheduled that day…and there were many screaming girls (and their mothers) in attendance.  this year, no Twilight meant less girls – although there were a couple NON-comic fans in line near me.  it was their first year at the Con and they were there for “Salt” and “Megamind.”  both of these struck me as odd…especially since “Salt” was opening that week. why wait in line for hours to see a preview of something coming out soon?  but it definitely illustrates that part of the convention’s continued growth is due to it’s more “inclusive” nature.

a couple things stood out about the TRON panel.  the first was the use of audience participation.  part way through the event they had the entire 5000 person crowd do a series of karaoke style shout-alongs that were being recorded FOR the movie.  we said things like “Res-ner,” “Disk wars,” and “De-Res.”  we stomped our feet and cheered…and in between NO ONE misbehaved.  nobody shouted, or whistled, or yelled “freebird.”  everyone played along.  it was really remarkable. by including the crowd in the filmmaking process, they had just made them 5000 fans. people want to feel special. and when they feel special, they tell other people about WHAT made them feel that way. in this case, it was the makers of TRON.

the other thing was something that Jeff Bridges said:

“We need modern myths.”

this really made me think.  after “Star Wars” – what do we have?  ”The Matrix?” anything else?  there is something deep seated and important about myths.  so, how do I tell stories that fulfill the same needs as the “myths of old?”

Green Lantern

Peter Sarsgaard, who plays the villain Hector Hammond in the film, told a story of when the director, Martin Campbell pitched him the roll.  the director told him the story through HIS character’s eyes.

why is this important?  it makes the story REAL for the actor.  it shows them the journey that THEIR character will go on.  making the character more interesting will help get talent.  it’s that simple.  why would a talented, in-demand actor want to be in ______ movie?  there needs to be a hook, and showing them the story as their character would experience it is a good way to do it.

Cowboys & Aliens + Captain America

both films showed rough, unfinished footage.  why do this?  why show something that isn’t 100% perfect?

because it makes the audience feel special (just like with TRON).  letting them see something exclusive sets up fan loyalty.  a core group of committed fans can MAKE a movie even before it is done with production. many would argue that the buzz that the Jon Favreau’s first “Iron Man” earned at Comic Con set it on the early road to success.  personally I can’t wait to see “Cowboys & Aliens” his next flick…and I’ve told numerous people how awesome it looks.

Let Me In

when should a movie be re-imagined? rebooted? that is, when should a film be remade? this question was the “elephant inside the room” at this panel.  after all, the Swedish film “Let The Right One In” has been rated as one of the best movies.  EVER. I’m not sure that the questioned was every really answered, but it was interesting to see the director, Matt Reeves, dance around the question.  without a doubt, he definitely loves the source material (a *gasp* book) AND the Swedish version of the film. with his version of the tale, he is not trying to “one up” or “replace” the first film, rather he seeks to add another interpretation to the source material.

he had several intriguing things to say; for me the most interesting were the notes he received from Spielberg regarding working w/ children.  since one of my leads for “Certified” is a kid, I paid close attention to these.

first off, let them come up with stuff.  no need to feed them everything, let them start with how THEY imagine things.  kids have great imaginations and if you can build off those, it will be a more organic process for them.

second, have them journal AS their characters.  every day they can write about whatever they want, as their characters, only rule is they must share and discus w/ director.  I don’t think this will be necessary for “Certified,” since it’s such a short project, but I’ll keep it in mind for future projects.

galactic pimpin' ain't easy

while walking around the floor I also had some thoughts regarding my own work, and specifically how I “pitch” it to people.

when people ask me “what sort of films do you make?”  I’ve invariably said “short films and music videos.”

this is a horrible answer.  it’s a conversation ender.  I can talk about my work… and I should.  this happened once at a booth where I was buying a plush toy and later that night I was thinking about it.  I realized that I need to change how I answer that question, so I’ve been working on it.

what sort of films do I make?  I make films that deal with reality and question our perception of it.  my work is a surreal, fantastic, quirky, and often funny take on the human condition.  what does it mean to be a member of society, to be a co-signer of the social contract and how does our perception of reality affect how we do participate in society?  most often I’m working the sci-fi, fantasy, or noir genres.

it still needs a little work, and that might be a little too didactic for some, but it’s a good start.

on my last day at Comic Con, I spent about 9 hours in Hall H. I had the best seats I’ve EVER had…I could actually see the faces of the people on the panels.

here’s a pic of the screen from near my seat.

best seat ever?

and then…this GIANT guy sat in front of me. take a look at how much of screen his head blocked out.

worst seat ever?

ahhh well. C’est la vie.

Or in Klingon, “vetlh ‘oH yIn.”

-Luke

fanboy signage

Black Maps

posted on June 10, 2010 in art,photo,review

A couple of weeks ago I went with some friends to the Annenberg Space For Photography. It’s a gallery and lecture space next to the CAA building, the talent agency affectionately know as the “Death Star” for it’s warm and cuddly atmosphere.

We were there to see photographer David Maisel give a lecture about his work entitled “Black Maps.”

When the lecture started, I was confused. Why was he showing pictures of oil paintings? I expected to see some of his work. It took me a while to realize that those WERE photographs.

In the simplest terms, David does high altitude aerial photography of the interaction between man and the environment. Scenes of mines, clear cuts, drained lakes, and expansive urban environments were the primary focus of his lecture that evening.

The confusion on the origin of the first images is actually something to be expected with his work. One of the reasons that he uses aerial photography is so that “nothing will tell you where you are.” By eliminating perspective and context, he forces the viewer to examine the image for the sake of the image.

This unearthly perspective also adds tension, chaos and a sense of “the lack of control” to the images. The best art marries theory and practice by having the themes of the work represented in medium. And these photos exemplify that, because in many cases they feature massive environmental calamities. The pieces from his “Lake Project” details the destruction caused by the draining of Owens Lake. The lake was drained to provide water to Los Angeles. In providing life to the city, the water department created an environment that produced toxic dust storms in the Owens Valley.

Is the environmental impact apparent from the photos or do we need to learn more about the circumstances that created what we are seeing? This is an element of the duality of Maisel’s work. On one hand there is a aesthetic beauty to the images, there is no denying the brilliant colors and stunning compositions. On the other hand they represent a wanton pillaging of the Earth and, in many cases, highly toxic and dangerous spaces.

But this is not immediately apparent as the forced perspective renders the photos abstract. Are we to judge the image alone, or the image in context? Do we see the beauty or the horror? David would argue that there is no need to separate the elements, they can exist together at the same time.

While his photographs seem to be an indictment against the practices of logging firms and mining companies, David strongly avoids this. He points out that many of the chemicals he uses in photography come from these mines. He is complicit in what is happening. And by viewing the photographs and by buying his book of photography, we too, as the audience become complicit. It’s a challenging concept and a bold statement that doesn’t limit itself to his photography.

“The audience completes the work” he stated. It seems like a given, but if photography is a form of perception, what makes it different from actually seeing something is the ability to share that perception with someone. And it raises the question without an audience would there even be art at all?

-Luke

All images © David Maisel. More can be found at his site, http://www.davidmaisel.com/

Good Weddings, Bad Movies, and Ugly Manners. 


posted on July 1, 2007 in behind-the-scenes,production,review

alight, so most of you know I’m a film maker…but I’m not sure how many of you know what I do for a “day job.”



I work in post-production…often on Made for TV movies (MOW’s)…often on really really bad MOWs. The thing is though, there are bad movies. And then there are movies that are so bad that they take on a life of there own…they achieve new goodness.



This one I actually did a little work on…I recommend seeing it. It’s every bit of what the review describes.



Also, occasionally I’ll go film things. Usually for friends…and often for free. I’m a pretty good shooter…I have a good eye, but it isn’t what I want to do – so I don’t spend time searching out that sort of work.



My friend Chris got married yesterday, and a couple months back, he asked if I could help him out and film it. Of course I said yes. I also knew that to do a good job, I’d need more than 1 camera, so I hired my friend Christian to help me film it.



It was a really nice wedding..I usually don’t think to highly of the event – but this one was nice. We had little to no technical problems, we didn’t miss any of the important events, got some good interviews, dance footage, cake cutting and so on. We shot the ceremony with 3 cameras, Christian & I on opposite sides near the front of the church, and a static camera in the balcony at the rear of the church.



That is…it was supposed to be static.



Why was it not you ask? Well the answer rhymes with “Ron Stake.” That is the name of the “sound guy,” at this church. From my very first interactions with this man it was clear there were going to be issues.



We spoke on the phone and he repeatable interrupted me, spoke over me, and continued on and on explaining things to me after I made explicitly clear that “I got it.”



It’s ok if you don’t know all the answers…a lot of us are still learning. I had trouble with the white balance on the camera for example..but when you both don’t understand the job you are supposed to be doing AND then proceed to tell me how to do my job – which I do know how to do…



that just ain’t cool.



For example: 

He and the wedding planner, while consistently talking to Chrisitian and I like we were disrespectful children NOT professional filmmakers, proceed to lecture us about NOT SHOOTING FROM ON STAGE.



Then, not 5 minutes later, he suggests that we set up 1 camera on stage behind the organ. wtf. then he asks us about it again.



But this “professional” sound guy doesn’t know how to take an XLR feed out of the mixing board so that we can record on something other than a mono-channel VHS tape.



And the coup de grace, while the ceremony is proceeding he goes over to my “static” camera and reframes. MULTIPLE TIMES. I did not ask him to do this. He did not ask me if he should do this. I said nothing that would indicate tacid approval of such actions.



What gives the sound guy the idea that he should be adjusting the camera? Does he think that I don’t know what I’m doing? Is he an amateur videographer in his spare time? Is he on psychotropic drugs? Should he be?



Luckily I don’t ever have to work with him again. I guess that’s one good thing about shooting in Orange, CA…



-Luke



p.s. Next week I’ll be uploading a new short…so stay tuned.

Spiderman 3 & Mexico 


posted on May 12, 2007 in review,travel

Here’s a fairly spoiler free review of the latest Spiderman movie…

The film starts off with continuation from where Spidey 2 left off. Peter & MJ’s love is continuing to grow. Harry wants to kill Peter. MJ just got her first Broadway show…things rapidly go downhill in all three areas…in addition it turns out that the man Peter thought killed his Uncle Ben didn’t do it.

And the other criminal just escaped prison…

Add an alien symbiote, troubles at work, and Gwen Stacy and Spidey has problems…big problems.

—-

The Good
Character development
Fight Scenes
That wonderful Bruce Campbell
Harry/Peter story
Topher
Sandman’s birth

The Not So-Good
Too much plot for 1 movie.

The Bad
The butler scene…you’ll know if when you see it.

All in all, if you liked either one of the Spiderman movies…you should see it.

—–Mexico—–

My first trip to Mexico…it had to happen eventually I only live 3 hours away. My friend Chris is getting married, so we went down there for his bachelor’s party.

Late nights, long drives, fish, more fish, people getting sick, naps, drinks, dancing, cigars, sleep, and a drive home. A good weekend. My only complaint is that the week was too quick.

-Luke

oceanside bathroom.
oceanside bathroom

Paul
Paul

Dan
dan

Jeff
jeff

Sergio
Sergio

yeeeaaar!
yeeear

Dan sleeps with the fishes
Dan sleeps with the fishes

Matt the great White fish slayer
Matt the great white fish slayer!

cleaning
fish toss

ensenada sunset
ensenada sunset

pappas & beer
dancedance

baja
Mexican Palm

-Luke

Hot Fuzzy Flaming Skulls, OR.

posted on April 27, 2007 in review,travel

This last week I was traveling, first to Eugene, OR to hang with my sister, then to Bremerton, WA to see my Parents and Grandparents.

I saw a couple of movies over the trip, “Ghost Rider” & “Hot Fuzz.” I enjoyed them both, although for much different reasons.

Ghost Rider

I paid $1.50 for this movie. And let me tell you, it was worth every penny.

First off, Nick Cage was actually pretty decent…although the young version of him really looked more like Rob Low…

The fights were extra lame, Ghostrider didn’t even really trade punches with the guys – he just whipped out his magic powers and destroyed them.

Eva Mendes took the cake. She looked super hot in every shot, but had the worst dialogue ever. I can’t really blame her, unless she add-libbed everything. Line after line brought uproarious laughter from my sister and I.

Hot Fuzz

I cannot recommend this movie enough. It is so smartly made and so funny.

The team that made ‘Shaun of the Dead’ takes the same approach to a cop movie. Homages, references, and parodies abound.

The characters, especially Nick Frost’s appears to have learned everything he knows about policing from watching Hollywood movies. Especially ‘Point Break’ and ‘Bad Boys II.’ He asks Simon Pegg’s character numerous questions like “have you ever shot two guns while flying thru the air?” and “have you ever shot a gun while in a high speed chase?” And then…all these things happen. It’s amazing. It’s like every guilty cop movie pleasure rolled into one, but in a smart way, so you feel a little less guilty about it.

See this movie. Support good cinema.

Oh, also the editing was super sweet.

——-

Here are some pics from my trip…

The Sisters
The Sisters

Teal’s view
Teal's view

cinema rules. ummm….yeah.
no firearms?

Chester!
Chester!

Northern bound…
Northern bound!

Puget Sound
Puget Sound!

Next week I’ll have another new video.

-Luke